The Man Who Saved Rutgers Football

27 01 2012

There used to be a time for Rutgers football when a 25-point loss at home was the highlight of the season. In fact, this time was not that long ago, and I remember it well. It was a blustery early November afternoon and we were sitting in the upper deck of an unusually packed Rutgers Stadium as the Scarlet Knights led the No. 1 ranked Miami Hurricanes 17-14.

I say unusually packed because in those days the stands were typically barren on most Saturdays, with the school desperately giving out tickets to anyone who would fill the seats, to anyone who would even pretend to be interested in a football program that was mightily struggling.

But on that afternoon, midway through the second season of coach Greg Schiano’s tenure, there was a brief glimpse of the hope that Rutgers saw when they hired him away from the very school they were beating that day. Although the Hurricanes would rattle off 28 unanswered points and win the game 42-17, and although Rutgers would finish the season a dismal 1-11, that game and that brief 3-point lead was enough to knock Miami out of their No. 1 ranking for at least one week, and it was certainly enough to restore just a glimmer of hope in a football program that had long been an afterthought in New Jersey sports.

During his 10 years as head coach of the Rutgers Scarlet Knights, Greg Schiano restored pride in a school and a football program that desperately needed it. The “Birthplace of College Football” could once again proudly declare itself as such without receiving the harsh ridicule that had come to be associated with the scarlet “R” during the 1980′s and 1990′s. To put it plainly, he rebuilt Rutgers football from the ground up, turning it from a rusty and wind-beaten shack on the banks of the Raritan into the proud, gleaming behemoth that it is today (complete with 12,000 new seats and a shiny new jumbotron).

When I arrived at the university in 2005 as a student, I brought with me the hopes that I would one day get to sit in Rutgers Stadium with my fellow students and cheer for a winning football team, a team that I could be proud of, and a team that packed the seats with a sea of Scarlet red and regularly played games on ESPN. The team was coming off of a 4-7 season before I began my freshman year on the banks, and I figured my dream of watching a contender was possible, but still far off.

Boy, was I wrong.

That 2005 season saw Rutgers play in its first bowl game in over two decades, and although we lost, it was certainly a sign of things to come. Little did I know that less than 12 months later, I would be witnessing the game that would put Rutgers football on the map for good and become one of the most exciting moments in the history of the school and the state of New Jersey.

That warm November night in 2006 was when Rutgers football officially went from pretender to contender. No longer was a 25-point loss to a Top 5 team considered a high point. No, we wanted more than that. We wanted to taste victory, we wanted to rush the field, to soak in the beauty of college football relevance, to watch our team lead off that night’s edition of SportsCenter. By erasing a 25-7 deficit and knocking off No. 3 Louisville to remain unbeaten, we got just that.

That week, Rutgers would rise to the highest BCS ranking in school history, at No. 6, and it seemed surreal. In a span of only 5 years, Greg Schiano turned Rutgers football from the laughingstock of the Big East into a legitimate BCS contender, and he did it with a roster loaded with future NFL talent like Ray Rice, Brian Leonard, Kenny Britt, Devin McCourty, Tiquan Underwood and Anthony Davis. No longer was the school begging people to fill the seats of Rutgers Stadium — now they had to build more seats just to fit everyone who wanted to be there, who wanted to witness this transformation. In fact, in my 4 years at Rutgers, I went from easily being able to get free tickets to games to having to enter a lottery just for the chance to get tickets. By my senior year, students had to pay to get in. Crazy, huh?

After receiving five different Coach of the Year awards for his stellar 2006 season, the offers began rolling in for prestigious coaching jobs all over the nation. Miami, Notre Dame, Michigan, you name the vacant head coaching position and chances are that Schiano was offered the job — and turned it down. Born and raised in the state of New Jersey, Schiano was a Jersey boy all the way through. He had helped to resurrect this downtrodden football program and now he was going to stick around and watch it flourish. Or so we had thought.

Less than a month ago, Rutgers defeated Iowa State in the Pinstripe Bowl at Yankee Stadium to pick up its school-record 5th consecutive bowl win, which is now the longest active streak in the nation. With 8 wins or more in five of the last six seasons and two second place finishes in the Big East, Rutgers is now a school that attracts top high school recruits, instead of scaring them away. Just last season, we landed Savon Huggins, one of the top running backs in the nation in high school. What state was he from? New Jersey. In the past, top New Jersey high school players would typically have shunned Rutgers to attend Penn State or Pittsburgh or West Virginia. Now, we had enough clout to snag this in-state talent we so sorely needed.

The 2011 Rutgers football team exceeded most preseason expectations by finishing 9-4. With a young, mostly inexperienced team filled with underclassmen, the fact that this year’s Scarlet Knight squad was able to scratch together 8 regular season wins and an impressive bowl victory over a Big XII school was a big accomplishment and a reason to have hope for the next few years, especially after a disappointing 2010 campaign. With letters of intent being signed next week, Rutgers was gearing up for another successful offseason of recruiting until a bomb was dropped around noon yesterday.

Nobody saw this coming, not even people closely connected to Schiano inside the Rutgers football organization. There had not been a single word uttered about Schiano being considered for an NFL head coaching position until the rumor slipped out yesterday morning and quickly evolved into a full-fledged story.

Schiano was out.

Just like that, after 10 years of building a program, a stadium, a community and salvaging a long-forgotten fanbase, the Greg Schiano era was over. He is headed to Tampa Bay, to the NFL, where many college coaches have tried and failed before him. Nick Saban, Steve Spurrier, Butch Davis, Bobby Petrino, Dennis Erickson, Lane Kiffin, and the list goes on. It’s not an easy adjustment to make, especially when the pressure is on you from a fanbase that won’t accept a period of rebuilding. The NFL is not like college football, and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers are not the Rutgers Scarlet Knights.

You see, here at Rutgers we were used to decades of losing. When Schiano came in before the 2001 season we weren’t expecting a quick turnaround, or even a turnaround at all. Things like that don’t happen overnight in college football. You need recruits, and you need time. In the NFL, things move much faster. The Buccaneers won their division just a few years ago and have a Super Bowl title. Their fans pay a lot of money for tickets and aren’t going to wait around 4 years for Schiano to rebuild. They want to win, and they want to win now.

Will Schiano be just another college coach who fails in the NFL? Will he long to be on the sidelines of High Point Solutions Stadium next October when the Bucs start the season 2-5 and the fans start getting antsy? Only time will tell.

Of course there are college coaches who have succeeded in the NFL too — Jim Harbaugh is a recent one that comes to mind, and Pete Carroll isn’t doing a bad job in Seattle right now, given the scarce amount of talent he was handed. So there’s hope for Schiano in South Florida.

But what about here at Rutgers? I’m not going to pretend that I’m okay with Schiano leaving the way he did, right before one of the biggest weeks of the year for recruitment. I’m not going to pretend I’m happy with his decision to leave after all he’s done for the program. But I won’t be bitter either. I recognize what he did for Rutgers football, and I thank him for that. Without him, we might still be celebrating 7-6 victories over the University of Richmond instead of scanning the weekly AP rankings to see if Rutgers has cracked the Top 25. The Top 25 was a distant and impossible dream when he arrived in Piscataway, and he made it a reality in only five years.

For that, we will thank him, and wish him the best of luck in Tampa Bay. Just as long as they aren’t playing the Giants.





We Really Do Need a Playoff System in College Football. Really.

8 09 2010

On Monday night I watched an extremely well-played, competitive, entertaining and important college football game. Although we have just completed the first full week of college football and although it was only September 7th, I can see Monday night’s game between #3 Boise State and #10 Virginia Tech going down as one of the best games of the season by the time all is said and done. It had all the makings of a big, memorable game, right down to the neutral site with fans of both schools battling for control of the crowd, the obscenely hideous alternate uniforms and the late-game heroics engineered by Kellen Moore and the Broncos.

We all know that it was a big game. It was a big game for the Hokies and an even bigger game for the Broncos of smurf-turf fame, trying to establish some long sought-after credibility on their quest to finally reach the national title game. How do we know it was a big game? Because after Kellen Moore completed what ultimately proved to be the game-winning touchdown pass with 1:09 to go in the game, Brent Musberger reacted as if it was November 27th instead of September 7th and Boise State had just clinched a spot in the BCS Championship game.

Call me crazy, but I think there’s something a little backwards about having your season decided in the opening game, no matter what sport it is. Had Boise State not pulled out the victory at FedEx Field the other night, it would have been next to impossible for them to reach the national title game. With only two ranked teams on their schedule, a loss to one of them would be a blemish too big for BCS voters to ignore and they would be easily overlooked at the end of the season by other 1-loss teams with tougher schedules from the Big Ten, Big XII or SEC.

Does it make sense for a team to have their season decided by the first game? No, it doesn’t. It doesn’t make even the tiniest shred of sense, and that’s why there needs to be a playoff system implemented in college football. Now I’m not saying that it’s a definite lock for Boise State to reach the title game after Monday night’s win, but if you watched the game and listened to the reactions of Brent Musberger and Kirk Herbstreit, you would think that it is. After all, they currently rank at #3 in the BCS and the remainder of their schedule, aside from a September 25th match-up against #25 Oregon State, is about as soft as the Mets’ lineup. As long as they can run the table against their conference opponents like Utah St., Fresno St., Hawaii and Nevada and remain undefeated, they have a legitimate shot at playing for the national title. If either Alabama or Ohio State loses a game before Boise State does, and it’s largely possible that they will given their schedules, then the Broncos can catapult them into the top 2.

So why put an undefeated Boise State in the title game this year when they have been snubbed by BCS voters for the last 5 years? Because this year I think the BCS committee is finally ready to acknowledge the Broncos as a legitimate college football powerhouse and they are finally ready to give them their due. They have finished undefeated three times since 2006 but in each of those seasons never finished ranked higher than #4 in either the AP or Coaches Poll. So now, after almost a solid decade of winning, the BCS seems ready to allow Boise State to flirt with the one girl at the bar that they could never seem to approach before – the national title game.

Good for them, it’s about time…but I still have a problem with this. Now don’t get me wrong, I am all for seeing Boise State play for a national title. I think it’s great for college football to have a smaller school from a non-major conference like Boise State have a shot at winning the whole thing, just like I thought it was great for college basketball to see Butler battling Duke for a national title back in March. Everyone was afraid of how that would turn out, but look what happened, not only was it an instant classic, but Butler came within inches of stealing the title and people are still talking about it 5 months later. Tell me that isn’t good for the sport?

So that’s not the argument I’m making. The argument that I’m making is that we shouldn’t have to rely on a committee of voters to decide what teams should be worthy of playing for the national title, and likewise those teams like Boise State or TCU shouldn’t have to wait on a committee of voters to decide whether or not they are ready to be recognized for winning. A playoff system, much like the one implemented in college basketball, would allow teams to make their own paths to the national title. Would a team like Boise State survive in a playoff system against bigger powerhouses like Alabama, Florida or Texas? Who knows, anything is possible, but we’ll never know until it actually happens. Who would have ever bet on a team like Butler running the table all the way through the championship game this year? Nobody did, but it happened and it happened because they earned their way there, not because a bunch of voters put them there.

It’s time to allow the college football season to be decided in December like it should be, and not on Labor Day. It’s time for a playoff system.





The Endless Appeal of the Underdog

5 04 2010

Don't pretend that you won't be openly rooting for Butler tonight.

Tonight, when Opening Day is winding down and Mets fans have been painfully reminded of just how bad our team really is, two college basketball teams will take the court in Indianapolis for a shot at the 2010 NCAA Men’s National Championship. One of those teams, the Duke Blue Devils, is coached by Mike Krzyzewski, with a total of 76 NCAA tournament wins under his belt and 4 national titles in the last 19 years, along with a handful of Final Four appearances.

The other team that will battle it out in Indy tonight? The Butler Bulldogs. Representing the Horizon League, a mid-major conference that also includes the basketball powerhouses of Cleveland State, Detroit, Green Bay (this conference sounds more like the NFC North), UW-Milwaukee and Valparaiso, Butler is the embodiment of every small school across the nation with big dreams.

Although I picked Butler to go down in the first round of this year’s tournament to UTEP, there was a part of me that always knew that they could make a run to the national championship (I’m just kidding). However, even though I didn’t pick them to make it past the first day, I am going to be rooting for them like my bracket depended on it (it’s been in the garbage since the Sweet 16) when they tip-off against Duke tonight.

Chances are, you’ll be rooting for Butler too, and I know exactly why. It’s because we, as Americans and as sports fans, don’t love anything more than a good, compelling, inspiring underdog story. I mean, we (America) were even underdogs ourselves at one point in history. Yeah, I’m absolutely talking about the Revolutionary War. Don’t think that I can’t slip a little history lesson into a column about the Final Four, because I can, AND I JUST DID.

Anyway, the allure of the underdog is something we can never seem to resist. Whether or not you’re a sports fan, chances are that you’re familiar with the phenomenon of the underdog. In fact, if there was no such thing as the underdog, Hollywood would probably have run out of movie ideas 40 years ago. Either that, or we’d be getting ready for the release of Transformers 28: Cooking With Optimus Prime.

You can find a quality underdog story in pretty much 85-90% of the movies you watch. Forrest Gump? Underdog story. Hoosiers? Underdog story. Rudy? The ultimate underdog story. We love underdogs in this country. Actually, that’s inaccurate – the entire world loves underdogs. The movie that won Best Picture at the Oscars two years ago, Slumdog Millionaire, was an underdog story from beginning to end. Why do we love underdogs so much? It’s because everyone likes to believe that they are the underdog deep down inside. We root for the underdogs because if they can do it, then anyone can.

Underdogs in sports encapsulate all the things that we love about the typical Hollywood underdog story, only playing out in real life, right before our eyes. I can’t help getting constantly sucked into falling for underdogs. I can probably trace it all back to the 1994 Stanley Cup Finals when the Rangers beat the Canucks in seven games. I was 7 years old at the time and not even a huge hockey fan, but I was oddly drawn to the series and the underdog story that surrounded the Rangers, who were trying to end their 54-year championship drought.

Since then, I’ve been captivated by a number of underdog teams over the years, in pretty much every sport. The Florida Marlins in 1997 and 2003, a team with one of the smallest payrolls in baseball that made two improbable postseason runs in 6 years and won two World Series titles; the 2004 Boston Red Sox, probably one of the most memorable underdog stories of the last few decades, the team that came back from a 3-0 deficit to the Yankees in the ALCS to break their 86 year World Series drought; George Mason’s unforgettable road to the Final Four in 2006 (much like the 2009-2010 Butler Bulldogs); the Colorado Rockies and Tampa Bay Rays World Series runs in 2007 and 2008 which unfortunately fell short, and of course the 2007 New York Giants, the road warriors who beat the 18-0 Patriots to the throne to claim the Lombardi Trophy.

Underdogs are not a new concept either. Even the Bible features an underdog story, probably the father of all underdog stories. Ever hear of David and Goliath? Yeah, that’s right, even Jesus was a fan of underdogs. Underdogs aren’t just fun to watch and root for, they also serve as ways to inspire us, and also ways for us to lose tons of money by betting against them.

Here’s a guide to the four different kinds of underdog teams you might encounter in sports. Think of it as a field guide for beginners, as well as a way to help you recognize these Teams of Destiny so that you won’t make the mistake of betting against them and end up trying to back over your own foot with your SUV.

1) The Championship Drought Underdog

This underdog story usually features a team that has either never won a championship in its history, or a team that hasn’t won a championship in a ton of years. A team like the 2004 Red Sox for example, which hadn’t won a World Series since the Ford Model T was cutting-edge engineering. This team will go through their entire postseason run with their incredibly lengthy drought being mentioned at every possible opportunity and beaten into the ground by announcers and analysts almost to the point where they’re almost trying to turn you against them. You can guarantee that every time the Chicago Cubs make the playoffs that Joe Buck and Tim McCarver will do everything but hold a séance on the pitcher’s mound for the ghosts of the 1908 Cubs.

The Championship Drought Underdog is unique from all other underdogs because they can sometimes be a very respected and storied franchise. They might even make the playoffs year in and year out, but they’re still classified as underdogs because they can never seem to break past the imaginary wall that’s keeping them from winning the title. Think of them as the sports equivalent of that one friend you has no problem with meeting girls at bars and getting their number, but just can never seem to be able to seal the deal.
When a Championship Drought Underdog, or CDU, finally breaks through and wins that title, it’s a surreal feeling. It’s the feeling of experiencing something you thought would never happen in your lifetime.

2) “The Little Team That Could” Underdogs

These underdogs are usually teams that have been bullied for years in their respective divisions and are usually perennial doormats. They have a miniscule payroll and their roster is often filled with either names you’ve never heard of or names you can’t even pronounce, but somehow they band together and make an improbable run for to the postseason. These teams are usually the product of “right place at the right time” circumstances and everything short of the planets lining up and raining gold coins on their practice facility. What are some recent examples of this? The 2008 Arizona Cardinals certainly come to mind, also the 2009 New Orleans Saints, the 2007 Colorado Rockies, the 2008 Tampa Bay Rays, and probably a ton of other teams I’m forgetting right now.

The thing about these types of underdogs is that you often don’t see them coming. Sometimes they come out of nowhere and sometimes, they disappear right back to nowhere when their magical run is over. You can never tell when one of these kinds of underdogs can pop up, and that’s why they’re so dangerous.

3) The “Injured Star Player” Underdog

This kind of underdog is fairly self-explanatory. Usually it’s a team that is missing its best player due to injury, or retirement, or felony conviction….yet the team still continues to roll on almost inexplicably. Often, this team will come together amidst the adversity of losing their best player and use it as motivation to win. Other times, the team’s inexplicable run will allow people to realize that maybe this star player wasn’t really that important after all. A classic example of this kind of underdog is the 2007 New York Giants. They lost the face of their franchise, running back Tiki Barber, to retirement at the end of the previous season, and then lost another key player, Jeremy Shockey, to a broken leg in Week 15. Despite that, they rolled off 7 straight wins and won the Super Bowl. No big deal.

4) The “Where Is That School?” Underdog

This underdog is very similar to the second type, but it applies only to college, whereas the “Little Team That Could” mostly applies to the pros. The Butler Bulldogs would fall into this category. I’ll admit that I had no clue that Butler University was located 5 miles from Lucas Oil Stadium until I saw it on ESPN a week ago, after their Final Four berth. Some other examples of the “Where is that school?” underdog that I can think of off the top of my head would be the 2006 George Mason basketball team, the 2008 Appalachian State football team that upset Michigan, and even the 2006 Rutgers football team that rose all the way to #6 in the BCS before crashing back to Earth. I’m sure everyone knows that Rutgers University is in New Jersey now, but they sure as hell didn’t know in 2006.

So, after all that, we’re back to the Butler Bulldogs. With a sure-fire future NBA player in Gordon Hayward leading the way, they’re not as big of a long-shot as most people assume. According to just about every team that they’ve beaten in this tournament so far (Syracuse, Kansas State, Michigan State) they’re not really sneaking up on anyone. Nevertheless, they are still proving an enormous point that advocates of the BCS for college football have failed to even consider: that a small school from a even smaller conference can have a legitimate shot at winning a national championship in a major sport.

Tonight, the Butler Bulldogs from the Horizon League will play what might be considered a home-game, for a national title, 5 miles down the road from their campus. Only instead of Hinkle Fieldhouse, it will be in front of almost 72,000 people at Lucas Oil Stadium. A real-life David and Goliath story, the big, bad Duke Blue Devils against the little mid-major team from Indiana. I couldn’t be more excited.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.